I propose that religious historians are more likely to be at war with History for these reasons;
Atheists have no need to change the past to suit their needs and as we do not believe the mumbojumbo, have no reason to be subjective against Christian/Jewish/Islamic/Hindu etc history.
Christians reputation has constantly suffered because of scandals, crusades etc, that portray them in a bad light.
The religious have a natural subjectiveness that means they will defend their faith and spin their history, we, atheists, have nothing to defend except a lack of belief, boohoo.
Atheists have no need to change the past to suit their needs and as we do not believe the mumbojumbo, have no reason to be subjective against Christian/Jewish/Islamic/Hindu etc history.
Christians reputation has constantly suffered because of scandals, crusades etc, that portray them in a bad light.
The religious have a natural subjectiveness that means they will defend their faith and spin their history, we, atheists, have nothing to defend except a lack of belief, boohoo.