(April 5, 2025 at 8:01 pm)Alan V Wrote:(April 5, 2025 at 3:03 pm)Drew_2013 Wrote: I have yet to hear these explanations.
I can recommend the book God: The Failed Hypothesis by philosopher and physicist Victor Stenger.
I read Howard Blooms 'The God Problem' and was disappointed as I believe most atheists are. Victor Stenger is a minor voice when it comes to multiverse theory.
Here is a summary of Victor Stengers book.
One of the key arguments presented in the book is the problem of evil. Stenger asserts that the existence of unnecessary suffering and evil in the world is inconsistent with the idea of an all- powerful and benevolent God. He argues that if God truly exists, he would not allow such suffering to occur.
That's a theological argument. How does an atheist use theology to make an argument against the existence of a Creator?
Furthermore, Stenger delves into the realm of physics and cosmology to challenge the notion of a God who created the universe. He discusses the Big Bang theory, the laws of physics, and the fine-tuning argument, arguing that these phenomena can be explained through natural processes without invoking a divine being.
He's going against the grain here as many scientists claim multiverse and don't deny the universe is fine-tuned for life. Victor claims that if one of the constants was different other constants could be different also and produce the same result (which is still fine-tuned).
Additionally, the book's tone can be quite confrontational towards religious belief. Stenger's strong atheistic stance may alienate readers who hold religious beliefs, potentially hindering open dialogue and understanding between different perspectives. It is important to approach the book with an open mind and consider other viewpoints to engage in a well-rounded evaluation of the topic.
I suggest you read Martin Rees, Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe. Like your book, this is written by an atheist and highly acclaimed scientist. He doesn't just believe the universe is finely tuned for life, he provides the facts to make his case. He acknowledges it may point to a Creator...but he's an atheist and so subscribes to multiverse theory to explain the fine tuning. A more recent book, 'A fortunate Universe'. goes even further into the fine-tuning of the universe for life down to the molecular level.
Unlike most atheists I don't deny there is evidence we owe our existence to natural forces. I don't deny its possible we owe our existence to natural causes...I think its very unlikely.