(April 6, 2025 at 11:50 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(April 6, 2025 at 11:32 am)Drew_2013 Wrote: Check your pseudo science at the door. Universes don't evolve like organisms.
Sure they do.
On the ‘fine tuning’ thingy, have you considered that it could simply be a happy accident? Suppose the universe evolved to support life incidentally. . It’s a logical leap to presume that it was intentional.
Boru
Scientists have dismissed the happy accident theory which is why multiverse is popular. If someone flipped a coin heads 500 times in a row would you be dumb enough to conclude it was a lucky break?
Quote:Out of a billion skillion universes, at least one was bound to reach a point where life-as-we-know-it could thrive
Fine, you're a multiverse person. Most atheists aren't willing to concede the multiverse theory is necessary and because there is no direct evidence of other universes. I respect it as a plausible theory and an explanation for fine-tuning of the universe for life. However, it also multiplies entities to infinity and beyond ala Occams razor. I consider it the ultimate time and chance, naturalism in the gaps theory.