I will prove to you that God exists

[Drew_2013]

My 'bias' is the result of 'the astonishingly narrow parameters of certain characteristics of the universe, and that if they altered even a vanishingly small amount, then the carbon life we know of, could not have emerged'.

You seem awfully fixated on carbon-based life. Or humans. Or life as we know it. It reveals your bias since none of those are necessary. Once you accept the possibility of "life as we don't yet understand it" the odds become much greater. You don't seem to be able to get around your anthropocentric biases here.

I do accept it as a naturalism in the gaps argument for sure. Apparently you do as well.