(April 9, 2025 at 11:24 am)Drew_2013 Wrote:Nope, you're projecting, it is you who is trying to insert inexplicable supernatural magic, from a deity you can demonstrate no objective evidence exists or impossible, into gaps in our current knowledge. We already know natural cause are possible, this is an objective fact.(April 8, 2025 at 9:07 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: You seem awfully fixated on carbon-based life. Or humans. Or life as we know it. It reveals your bias since none of those are necessary. Once you accept the possibility of "life as we don't yet understand it" the odds become much greater. You don't seem to be able to get around your anthropocentric biases here.I do accept it as a naturalism in the gaps argument for sure. Apparently you do as well.
You cannot demonstrate any objective evidence the supernatural is possible, or a deity....
Nor of course can anyone else, despite millennia of navel gazing. This is why religious apologists, keep resorting to fallacious arguments, just as you keep doing.