I will prove to you that God exists

[Sheldon]

@Sheldon


And yet he can’t admit that he’s invoking magic. That’s what magic is - a natural phenomenon that we haven’t yet found the explanation for.

Boru

Its questionable who is invoking magic. 

No it really isn't, you have claimed a deity created the universe, can you offer any explanation or objective evidence as to how:

1. That deity exists is possible?
2. Possesses the supernatural powers required? 
3. Those powers work, and are used? 

If you can't you are demonstrably appealing to magic. This is your cue to use yet another straw man, to insist I evidence how the universe came to exist from only natural phenomena, despite me explaining each and every time, that I have made no such claim. 

Would it be more magical for a laptop to come together and assemble itself minus any plan or intent to do so? 

Sigh, false equivalence fallacy, laptops are manmade, we already know they're designed and created, as we have overwhelming objective evidence to support this. You have use a version of Paley's watch maker fallacy. 

You won't answer the question but its obvious.

Another lie, I have answered it, and every version of the fallacy you have offered previously, the answer is the same each time, you ingore it each time. 

It would be far more magical and unexpected if a laptop was caused by some unheard of natural process.

No idea what "far more magical" means, but this is yet another straw man fallacy, as no here has remotely claimed or implied this, laptops are not natural, they don't appear randomly in nature, it is an objective fact they are manmade and designed. 

Nothing would be more magical than if mindless natural forces that didn't intend themselves to exist, caused a universe with all the conditions to cause life to exist, caused the laws of physics we are utterly dependent on.

Begging the question fallacy, and so a circular reasoning fallacy. Also, it is an objective fact that natural phenomena exist, are causal, and possible, even if we don't understand what they might be, or how they worked in a particular instance. So whilst I can't claim the universe came about naturally, I can say they're more plausible than your claim for a creator deity using supernatural powers, as you're clearly violating Occam's razor by adding an deity, using inexplicable supernatural powers, neither of which you can demonstrate exist, or are even possible. Oh and you certainly have ignored that fact at every turn, so stop lying and projecting your dishonesty where it does not belong. 

The reason atheists are such a minority is because you sell a fish story few believe.

Wtf is a "fish" story? That comedic idiocy aside, you are of course using an argumentum ad populum fallacy, irrational to the last, and not even dimply aware of that fact, or what it means, it would seem.