Goodness so much stupid
Quote:Exactly why so few people are atheists. Then it shouldn't reject theism either.No the reason so few people are atheists is the dieses of irrationality and theism has no evidence and thus can be rejected till it does
Quote:You don't need to see one being made to reason it was intentionally caused to exist...right?The fact we know it is a man made object render the analogy to the universe moot
Quote:Debunked simply means people (atheists) disagreed with what he said. Furthermore in his time it wasn't known to the degree that the universe is fine-tuned for life.Debunking means your statement objectively refuted (which it has been ) To date you have shown no fine tuning
Quote:Do you know of some force inside spacetime that caused spacetime to exist? We have mountains of evidence that natural forces came into existence. That tells us nothing about what caused them to exist or why the myriad of exacting properties and characteristics for life obtained.You assume space time began to exist rather then simply changed in configuration. There is actually no evidence natural forces came into existence . Actually the fact there are tells us everything about why because everything to do with life realies on natural forces and to date you never shown any exacting properties are required you simply point to one known world with life and insist that because life developed there that's all there is
Quote:You don't have a decent counter explanation and that's why few people claim to be atheists.Atheist don't require one and actual reason most people are irrational
Quote:They would still be in just as narrow a range as ever only now you're saying for some reason, they had to be in that narrow range. I believe it was designed to be in that narrow range and if other universes are the same that just more evidence it was intentionally caused. I'm pointing out this is a bad argumentTo date you have never shown that they are narrow let alone that they should be narrow in any other universe
Quote:How did the forces that caused the universe to expand operate? Were those 'natural' forces inside spacetime that hadn't come into existence yet? A laptop isn't the universe its a far less complex contrivance. If mindless natural forces can cause the universe a laptop is child's play.This assumes without reason that space time came into existence that there are natural outside of space time this there is a first cause ete etc etc. Once again comparing a man made object who origins are known and whose creator is known to the universe which has none of those qualities false analogy
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM