(April 11, 2025 at 12:45 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:They wouldn't be called constants otherwise. The irony of this argument is its the preferred explanation for why we live in a universe that is fine-tuned for life is because they claim we live in an infinitude of universes with variable constants and we exist in the one that allowed our existence by happenstance. As if none of these scientists considered the possibility that it had to come out as it did. They reject that because it wouldn't look any different than being intentionally caused to be this way to produce life.(April 9, 2025 at 11:49 am)Drew_2013 Wrote: What would be your explanation that if a universe comes into existence unintentionally by mindless natural forces, that it 'has' to be in the same exacting narrow configuration that allowed life to occur in our universe? If it were so and we could observe other universes with the same properties, laws of physics, stars, planets solar systems it would only leave us to believe universes are caused to exist to produce life. It would be the same explanation why motherboards are identical, because they are intentionally caused to be identical.
Lastly, why would I have to prove Martin Ree's (and many other scientists) belief in multiverse theory? You don't seem to realize this is a naturalistic theory to explain how the universe we live in hit the right properties for life to exist.
Or that the physical constants of universes are constrained. Just sayin'.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 2, 2025, 10:38 pm
Thread Rating:
I will prove to you that God exists
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)