I will prove to you that God exists

[Angrboda]

My hypothesis our universe was intentionally caused to produce life is based (in part) on the same knowledge and observations these people of science base multiverse on. They're allowed to have their hypothesis and I'm allowed to have mine. Some day you folks might attempt cough up some better explanation so far you're not succeeding which is why people don't believe you. 

By all means be sure you submit your thesis for publication...I'm sure they need a good belly laugh.

You seem to want to have your cake and eat it too. On the one hand, you want these scientists to be so smart that they've honed in on multiverse theory, yet at the same time they're too dumb to see the obvious superiority of the design hypothesis. Well, which is it, Drew, are they super smart or super stupid? If it were so obvious that the universe was designed, surely they would simply accept that as the explanation and choose to work on something else. What is your explanation for why they don't?

Science follows the evidence, which is why I pointed out that you had no evidence that the universe was fine-tuned. Fine-tuning is an analogy to musical instruments and electronics where the characteristics can vary and be adjusted. If the characteristics cannot vary, then they cannot be adjusted, and the analogy of fine-tuning is a false analogy because the two things are not alike in a relevant way. In order to show that it is a valid analogy requires evidence that the characteristics could be other than what they are. In the absence of such evidence, claiming that fine-tuning is a valid analogy is nothing more than a bare assertion that can be rejected for any cause. That which can be asserted without evidence can be rejected without evidence.