RE: I will prove to you that God exists
April 12, 2025 at 1:35 pm
(This post was last modified: April 12, 2025 at 2:16 pm by Sheldon.)
(April 12, 2025 at 12:35 pm)Drew_2013 Wrote:(April 11, 2025 at 8:41 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: Emergent behaviors that lead from a simple set of basic rules to complex behaviors are favoured by thermodynamics because they're a more efficient mechanism for achieving stable low-energy, high-entropy states more rapidly. These emergent behaviors favour the emergence of life and sentience. The result is that the entire "fine-tuning" argument is a retrospective view that mistakenly underestimates how likely it is that sentience might arise in any possible universe.
Quote:Drew: "Most if not all are atheists."Rather destroying your argument their research in any way represents evidence, for your sky wizard, using inexplicable magic, ay, chuckles?
"they believe in naturalism and naturalist explanations,"
"they're not closet theists"
Quote:Drew: That looks more like plan and intent.
Not to them, as you have just stated. Oh dear, Drew, you just pulled your own pants down, and spanked yourself, again.
Quote:Drew: My hypothesis our universe was intentionally caused to produce life is based (in part) on the same knowledge and observations these people of science base multiverse on.
Drew: "Most if not all are atheists."
Oh dear, stepped on your own dick again. Now who does everyone think best understands the implications of their work, them, or you? It's not a hard question, is it chuckles?
Newsflash for chuckles, there is no scientific evidence for any deity, or anything supernatural. That's why the scientists you keep hilariously claiming support your superstitious beliefs, don't share them, as of course you just explained.
What was it you said earlier - for everyone else to read.
