(May 27, 2025 at 2:18 pm)Pat Mustard Wrote:(May 27, 2025 at 7:52 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: It may cover vandalism, but - like the lawyer in the video said - most private insurance companies have exclusions for damage due to war and domestic terrorism. The only way for the owners of protestor-damaged Teslas to be recompensed would be to sue the individuals who did the damage. Which may or may not work.
Boru
War and terrorism usually are protected by act of god clauses, because in most countries it is considered that no reasonable person or authority would consider it the duty of the insurer to cover losses in such extreme circumstances.
That's my take as well, but the current administration seeks to help any big business any way it can.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
