RE: It's A Quote
Today at 7:50 am
(This post was last modified: Today at 8:12 am by Belacqua.)
(Today at 5:52 am)Paleophyte Wrote: Dawkins was always a git and he hasn't aged well.
The poor guy has been pushed into an unfortunate position due to his need to remain consistent with what he's said before.
He's argued strongly and consistently that we should only accept as true the things that science can demonstrate. Science is our only means to discover what is true about the world.
Science, of course, works through examining only the objective, the empirical, the quantifiable, the repeatable evidence that's available for testing. This means that for Dawkins, the only way to determine if someone is a man or a woman is to look at chromosomes, genitalia, pelvis structure, etc. -- the scientific markers for maleness or femaleness.
Gender, on the other hand, cannot be examined and tested in this way. Therefore Dawkins cannot accept claims about gender which cannot be empirically and objectively evidenced.
He has no choice but to deny that trans women are women, if he wants to stay consistent with his "only science tells the truth" conviction. If he were to accept that trans women are who they claim to be, he would have to give up his commitment to the idea that only empirical and objective evidence should be trusted.
