RE: Ai music
February 10, 2026 at 1:51 pm
(This post was last modified: February 10, 2026 at 1:56 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(February 10, 2026 at 1:21 pm)h4ym4n Wrote:(February 10, 2026 at 11:35 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Argumentum ad populum doesn't work for art, either.
I realize guitar playing is your identity like a jesusgod belief is to religious people.
If that's what you think of me, you don't know me at all.
(February 10, 2026 at 1:21 pm)h4ym4n Wrote: I can guarantee you that I would not be able to tell the difference your godguiter playing and an ai solo.
I have no doubt about that.
(February 10, 2026 at 1:21 pm)h4ym4n Wrote: And I’ll bet that most average music listeners aren’t thinking wow your guitar playing stands out.
... and I'll bet I've made music that is easily differentiated from AI slop.
(February 10, 2026 at 1:21 pm)h4ym4n Wrote: Like someone else has said today, you just want to argue. your god is better than all the others.
I have my own opinions. If you guys cannot take viewpoints which differ from your own, maybe discussions aren't your bag. At any rate, when you resort to ad homs because someone disagrees with your views, it says more about you than about them. It relieves you of the obligation to compose a cogent reply, if nothing else.
(February 10, 2026 at 1:23 pm)h4ym4n Wrote:(February 10, 2026 at 11:35 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Argumentum ad populum doesn't work for art, either.
Does sales of music and top 10 music lists trump your AaP?
As if they aren't AaP ... <smh>
By this logic, "Itsy-bitsy Teeny-weeny Yellow Polka-dot Bikini" is musically superior to "The Well-Tempered Clavier", because the former charted and the latter didn't.


