RE: Probability and Evidence.
October 8, 2008 at 9:11 pm
(This post was last modified: October 8, 2008 at 9:15 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
Ah yes of course; because nothing can be proved or disproved evidence has to be based on probability...
However does that mean it is PROVEN that evidence can ONLY be based on probability meaning probability is proven? That there's no probability for the existence of the way we understand probability? Is this a paradox? Or is probability simply self-proven? Gospel?
I'm confused lol, nothing is proven, it's all about probability, except probability, that's proven?
Or is there merely a 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% reccuring probability that probability exists...
Basically I'm saying If nothing is proven everything needs probability...do you have to put a probability on the existence of probability?
Atm, this is confusing me, lol.
However does that mean it is PROVEN that evidence can ONLY be based on probability meaning probability is proven? That there's no probability for the existence of the way we understand probability? Is this a paradox? Or is probability simply self-proven? Gospel?
I'm confused lol, nothing is proven, it's all about probability, except probability, that's proven?
Or is there merely a 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% reccuring probability that probability exists...
Basically I'm saying If nothing is proven everything needs probability...do you have to put a probability on the existence of probability?
Atm, this is confusing me, lol.
