Veganism

[Angrboda]

If you're arguing that things that aren't identical should in some sense be "counted" as identical, then you're abandoning Liebniz's law to speak incoherently.

I'm not saying that things that aren't identical could still be counted as identical. I'm asking where the line is. As I asked, what counts as being human? You're yet to answer that, but you seem to think that I'm the one with a problem.

What counts as human is irrelevant to the question of whether there is a distinct thing that being human is. As long as there is, your question is a red herring.

You are essentially asking when we should treat something that is not human "as-if" it were human. That doesn't seem like a problem with either Liebniz's law or my application of it.