Veganism

[Thumpalumpacus]

So there is agreement, then. So it makes no sense for anybody to keep pretending like there is only disagreement and no agreement. And if the agreement somehow doesn't count: why not?

Because ad populum argumentation, on either side, is fallacious. In essence, argumentum ad populum is an appeal to subjectivity, which rather undermines any argument that morality is objective. One hundred people can be just as wrong as one person, and that cuts both ways.

If morality is objective, it needs to be shown how it exists outside human experience -- because human experience is inherently subjective.