You're a nutball. Path two depends upon there realistically being a higher understanding that is both achievable and significant. You haven't provided evidence of either. Nor has anybody else. It's just assumed. Which makes the claim that such paths exist based on an ipse dixit argument, which means it's invalid, and your conclusions aren't reliably warranted.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)


