(July 10, 2009 at 1:47 am)Arcanus Wrote: the evidence did not allow us to reject the idea that Smith is innocent, (ii) but nothing proved the idea that he is innocent either.
Smith is assumed to be innocent until otherwise demonstrated ... I don't see a problem with that and I have no idea what that has to do with any hypothesis.
Are you trying to say that a given god is assumed to exist until proven otherwise or, as it is typically assume in our camp, that there are no gods until specifically demonstrated?
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
