RE: More Ron Bashing
January 27, 2012 at 4:38 pm
(This post was last modified: January 27, 2012 at 4:40 pm by paintpooper.)
(January 27, 2012 at 4:23 pm)5thHorseman Wrote: He's imcompetent now PP. He's a deluded utopian.
You honestly think de-regulating is good?
You think ridding America of the Dept' of Education is good?
You think repealing Civil Rights Act is good?
His economic ideas would create a greater gulf in wage inequality.
Nothing wrong with being a utopian, thats how better things happen.
Yes I do think getting rid or trimming down Dept of Education would be good. As in a previous post I stated that the DOE had a budget of like 20 billion in 2000 and now has budget of 70 billion. With something like 5000 employees. So what is all that money doing? Children are not better off now, and NCLB was a huge failure. So yes I agree it should be dismantled or fixed or something it is broke now, and I don't see how anyone can disagree.
In a way yes, the civil rights acts let the federal government be a part of race relations. When you have "race quotas" you are actually promoting racism by creating lines that divide people due to race. You shouldn't divide people by race, its all about the individual, race is irrelevant. It helped in getting rid of Jim crow laws, but I think it over stepped. Jim crow laws are failure in government intervention in racism.
I'm not fully educated on this aspect yet. I can only read and debate you guys so much
Yes some de-regulation is good. I don't here him saying let anyone dump radioactive shit anywhere. Guess what we currently do that a lot. Some countries dump nuclear waste of the coast of Somalia... yeah look it up.
Regulations should be based off scientific and rational thought. It all matters on the context to say de-regulation is bad is misleading, cause it all matters on the actual context in which we are discuss the regulation or deregulation, and what if effects. I'm sure their are regulations in effect now that help people pollute/discriminate and make more money. It's all relative on what the regulations are and applied too.
Ok Lunch time for me. I need more energy to respond back to you guys all day..
(January 27, 2012 at 4:38 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote:(January 27, 2012 at 2:29 pm)paintpooper Wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/r...story.html
It's the same tired old crap. Same newsletter shit, cause that is ALL they have on him, which inst even anything.
right...because its not about his batshit nutty views on taking down the dept of education, or that he is a creationists nut ball, or many of the other weird things he supports...
...its all about that racist newsletter he has. Which, for some reason, you discount as not having any weight even though Paul has made it clear he opposes civil rights acts and supports people putting up "whites only" signs.
Gee... who knows why the news letter is such a thorn in his side?
You tell me why the Dept of Education is sooooo great?
I can agree that creationism is nutball. Thats about it.
