RE: More Ron Bashing
January 27, 2012 at 8:05 pm
(This post was last modified: January 27, 2012 at 8:15 pm by paintpooper.)
Quote:"0%" income tax? Might as well have no government and just have anarchy, which sounds much better to me. No govt to protect ownership of land, no govt to protect corporate powers. Screw Ron Paul. If we are going in the direction he is asking we might as well go full throtle Anarchism. If we are going to have Revolution, then lets not have some pussy revolution like voting for Ron Paul (may as well be the same as all the others). No, lets have a TRUE revolution and set up an anarcho-syndicate. No need for taxes since money will not exist. No need to fear corporate control over the government because corporations and government will no longer exist. No need to worry about the vast gap between the rich and poor as all property will belong to everyone. THEN we will have a true social libertarian society, not some "band wagon" where there is still inequality and potential for abuse.
The liberals see the govt as good, corporations as evil. Conservatives see corporations as good, and govt as evil. Anarchists see the truth, because their eyes are open: corporations and government are the same thing.
Corporations and government are the same thing, in the current paradigm we live in. There is no distinction between the two.
Hey I agree. I see this as the basis of a revolution. We won't get anything with Obama or those other stooges. I have read your anarchism posts and agree with a lot of the theory behind them. Legalizing drugs, stopping wars and imperialism, are all tenants of an anarchist society, along with eliminating fiat money system, I would think.
We the people need to be in power of our own resources and our own morality, and means of production. There can't be any other way. But for this to happen the "control" over us need to be reduced. The control by corporations and government. There is no perfect way out of this shit hole mess these people have got us into, but the work will be worth the effort for us and the generations to come.
Oh BTW. Did you ever read The Green Book By Gaddafi I showed you? http://www.mathaba.net/gci/theory/gb.htm
Cause your thinking sounds EXACTLY like his thinking in his book.
"Moreover, since the system of elected parliaments is based on propaganda to win votes, it is a demagogic system in the real sense of the word. Votes can be bought and falsified. Poor people are unable to compete in the election campaigns, and the result is that only the rich get elected. Assemblies constituted by appointment or hereditary succession do not fall under any form of democracy." Wouldn't you agree with this? Just one great quote from the book.
Just read it... I did... your an intelligent person you will grasp the contents and I think you will be amazed, and then question the aggression towards the country.
(January 27, 2012 at 8:01 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: So as long as you speak one thing, while your act does another, absolves you of the consequences of your own legislation, which would tip the current status, pro-abortion, to anti-abortion, not to let-the-states-decide-and-remain-agnostic-on-it?
Read the text.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:h1096:
SEC. 2. FINDING AND DECLARATION.
(a) Finding- The Congress finds that present day scientific evidence indicates a significant likelihood that actual human life exists from conception.
(b) Declaration- Upon the basis of this finding, and in the exercise of the powers of the Congress--
(1) the Congress declares that--
(A) human life shall be deemed to exist from conception, without regard to race, sex, age, health, defect, or condition of dependency; and
(B) the term `person' shall include all human life as defined in subparagraph (A); and
(2) the Congress recognizes that each State has the authority to protect lives of unborn children residing in the jurisdiction of that State.
