More Ron Bashing

[paintpooper]

ALL the credible evidence???!!!!I would be here for days trying to gather it all, there is so much and you know it.

No, I dont know it, and that is why I specifically asked you to show me specific evidence showing that 9-11 was an inside job. Please, in the future, refrain from suggesting that I "know it". I dont know it, and you need to prove it to me.

But there is one very juicy piece of evidence that I found on Wikipedia that shows the U.S. government has indeed planned to perform a terrorist attck on American soil as a false flag operation before 911. It is called Operation Northwoods and here is an exerpt:

I see. I ask for specific evidence pointing to an inside job for the 9-11 attacks, and you show me a failed suggestion to Kennedy about false flag jobs to get people to support a war with Cuba.

Things that make you go Hmmmmm...and then JFK got wasted.

Actually I dont think he got killed because of that. His last speech was about back room deals between corporations and politicians and he was planning on exposing it, that the American people deserved to know what was going on. They blasted his ass and kept the war going. Of course, I have ZERO evidence for any of this, so I must flat out say that I dont know. Im not going to suggest that "you know what I mean" when there is no way for you to know.

Now...

...is it possible that you can find evidence of an inside job for the 9-11 attacks?

Here is the JFK speech.
http://cuttingthroughthematrix.com/trans...peech.html

http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm
The neo-cons wanted to go to Iraq... in 1998. Clinton refused. Look who all signed that letter. All Bush cabinet members. Wolfowitz, head of World Bank... appointed by GWB, in 2004.... Deputy defense secretary.. before that and.... below

"He is a leading neoconservative.[5] As Deputy Secretary of Defense, he was "a major architect of President Bush's Iraq policy and ... its most hawkish advocate."[6] Donald Rumsfeld in his interview with Fox News on February 8, 2011 said that Wolfowitz was the first to bring up Iraq after 9/11 attacks during a meeting at presidential retreat at Camp David."

He was the first to bring up Iraq after 9/11. Well of course him and Donald asked Clinton to attack Iraq.

Now the World Bank is doing business in Iraq, Libya.
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL...74,00.html

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424...46022.html

Funny before neither country really needed foreign financing. Its all nation building, with loans with hug interest rates. In Libya usury(interest) was ILLEGAL.

Also the IMF can now do business.

http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2011/pr11329.htm

Both of those institutions were created after/during WW2. For the concept of nation building and "helping" economies plagued by war. They practice usury. Interest. Like most modern banks. But usury was illegal for so many years in many countries, now it seems normal, but it is not, it actually hinders the economic growth of countries.

http://empirestrikesblack.com/2011/06/fl...-for-euro/

http://goldnothoney.wordpress.com/2011/0...%E2%80%99/

I don't know the truth on 9/11s, but you have to look at who benefited the most from it. I'm not stating I have evidence, I just look at who benefits from certain things, nothing is a coincidence.