9/11 Truthers

[Kyuuketsuki]

[quote='Kyuuketsuki']there are two sides to the argument it's true; one side with substance (broadly speaking the official position) and one with none (the 9/11 truthers) so the constructive argument is done.

Yes the constructive argument is done, if you have decided that only one side of the argument has substance. But that was your decision, I did not end the constructive debate at the point.

they're just a bunch of headless chickens!

No, you miss the point ... it wasn't MY DECISION, it's simply that the truthers are full of sh**, they lie about and twist the facts to suit their own warped view of what happened on 911 and YOU are being gullible to believe their cr**!

To choose to be that gullible is YOUR decision.

I see the news media coverage of the event to be more of barnyard animal behavior, but that is the basis of our disagreeing on this issue. I am not here to defend ALL truthers, as I am not here to defend ALL theists. I only advocate people that have no defense, and in the name of factual exactitude. If you guys say things that are incorrect portrayals of reality, and the people you are making untrue statements about are not able to talk back, I will for them. As a truther, I exist, and so far don't fit too many of the pigeon holes you have laid out for ALL truthers...

Factual exactitude?

Honestly Pippy ... you wouldn't know factual exactitude if it was a wet kipper being beaten repeatedly around your head!

Talk about something interesting. I don't want to hear about the stupid buildings, it's over done. There is much more to 9/11 than an argument over engineering by non-engineers.

Says he conveniently side-stepping the fact that it was people on YOUR side (with your kind of views) that raised the conspiracy theories and that we HAVE been citing the experts.

Kyu