RE: More Ron Bashing
February 11, 2012 at 8:29 pm
(This post was last modified: February 11, 2012 at 8:47 pm by Bgood.)
What evidence is there that Osama Bin Laden carried out 911 attacks? None. What you might call evidence, is actually high tech propaganda. What you call "debunking" evidence is to what many 'truthers' call the most unconvincing horseshit. With all the circumstantial evidence pointing to a conspiracy theory, it is only logical to deduce that the conspiracy theory is correct. If ANYTHING, it is up to our government to prove to us, the citizens, how Al Queida pulled off this intricate plan ALONE, without any inside help. The official story smells phoney and highly improbable. Why all the secrecy and classified documents? The propagandists have definitely succeeded in pulling the wool over many atheist's eyes! That is too bad, you are skeptical of so many things except the one thing you should have the MOST skepticism for, which is government and it's war mongering, billionaire club. If 911 was not an inside job, then is the official story (which the government has supplied and paid for) the truth? If you believe that crap, you are a total SUCKER!!
All the debunking evidence I come across sounds so much like a lawyer trying to weasel his way out of some kind of cold, hard fact against his case. It is never convincing to me. Like the molten steel found in the basements, the debunkers admit that it was there but they won't admit to it being a product of THERMITE. I mean c'mon, they try to explain away all the realities of that fateful day with nonsensical, non-scientific spin. They make so many assumptions that are totally unqualified. JET FUEL takes down 3 buildings??? So coincidental that no other buildings fell, only the ones with billion dollar insurance policies that were given just weeks prior. Why did only WTC 7 fall due to "structural damage", but no other buildings in the vicinity of the twin towers fell? HHHmmm..what is your lame response to that?
All the debunking evidence I come across sounds so much like a lawyer trying to weasel his way out of some kind of cold, hard fact against his case. It is never convincing to me. Like the molten steel found in the basements, the debunkers admit that it was there but they won't admit to it being a product of THERMITE. I mean c'mon, they try to explain away all the realities of that fateful day with nonsensical, non-scientific spin. They make so many assumptions that are totally unqualified. JET FUEL takes down 3 buildings??? So coincidental that no other buildings fell, only the ones with billion dollar insurance policies that were given just weeks prior. Why did only WTC 7 fall due to "structural damage", but no other buildings in the vicinity of the twin towers fell? HHHmmm..what is your lame response to that?
You, yourself, as much as anybody in the entire universe, deserve your love and affection.
There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; not going all the way, and not starting.
Buddha
There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; not going all the way, and not starting.
Buddha