(July 25, 2009 at 11:17 pm)Anto Kennedy Wrote: I guess that means all sports teams are religions, all political parties are religions, in fact every social organisation is a religion by you're definition.
I think they'd also have to hold beliefs without evidence though. . . and also - where exactly do you draw the line between 'religion' and 'non-religion'?
How do you define it?
What I mean is, it may not be thought of as a religion. . . but if it's basically one in the sense it holds beliefs without evidence and is religious as in it has a certain degree of zealous 'religiosity', then it's basically a religion in every sense whether it's called one or not. . . because belief in God isn't even a requirement because there are religions without belief in God.
EvF
