The 'First Nations' have some explaining to do
February 28, 2012 at 11:08 pm
(This post was last modified: February 29, 2012 at 12:02 am by Rokcet Scientist.)
The 'First Nations' have some explaining to do. Because they weren't the 'First Nations': according to the most current research the Americas were first colonized by Europeans. I.o.w. by Caucasians. Solutreans, to be precise. During the last glacial max, via the ice sheet covering the north Atlantic. At least 10,000 years before the proto-Indians, the ancestors of the 'First Nations', streamed across the Bering Land Bridge in (relatively) great numbers.
The clincher is 'geological fingerprinting': “What’s more, chemical analysis carried out last year on a European-style stone knife found in Virginia back in 1971 revealed that it was made of French-originating flint.”
But when the Phoenician traders, Irish monks, Viking settlers, and Columbian conquistadores came looking, millennia later, there wasn't a Caucasian left. Only the 'First Nations'.
So what happened to the Caucasian earliest colonizers of America?
Those who first proposed this scenario of the Caucasian via-the-ice-sheet-colonizers, almost a decade ago, were ridiculed of course.
They have now clearly been vindicated.
![[Image: SolutreanWalkabout.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i75.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fi319%2FRokcetScientist%2FSolutreanWalkabout.jpg)
The clincher is 'geological fingerprinting': “What’s more, chemical analysis carried out last year on a European-style stone knife found in Virginia back in 1971 revealed that it was made of French-originating flint.”
But when the Phoenician traders, Irish monks, Viking settlers, and Columbian conquistadores came looking, millennia later, there wasn't a Caucasian left. Only the 'First Nations'.
So what happened to the Caucasian earliest colonizers of America?
Those who first proposed this scenario of the Caucasian via-the-ice-sheet-colonizers, almost a decade ago, were ridiculed of course.
They have now clearly been vindicated.
