[quote][quote='Rokcet Scientist' pid='246412' dateline='1330484924']
The 'First Nations' have some explaining to do. Because they weren't the 'First Nations': according to the most current research the Americas were first colonized by Europeans. I.o.w. by Caucasians. Solutreans, to be precise. During the last glacial max, via the ice sheet covering the north Atlantic. At least 10,000 years before the proto-Indians, the ancestors of the 'First Nations', streamed across the Bering Land Bridge in (relatively) great numbers.
The clincher is 'geological fingerprinting': “What’s more, chemical analysis carried out last year on a European-style stone knife found in Virginia back in 1971 revealed that it was made of French-originating flint.”
But when the Phoenician traders, Irish monks, Viking settlers, and Columbian conquistadores came looking, millennia later, there wasn't a Caucasian left. Only the 'First Nations'.
So what happened to the Caucasian earliest colonizers of America?
Those who first proposed this scenario of the Caucasian via-the-ice-sheet-colonizers, almost a decade ago, were ridiculed of course.
They have now clearly been vindicated.
[/quote]
I don't think that there are explanations to be done:
-The colonizers were clearly of perhaps distinct human cultures who lived a hunter gatherer style. Even the major language families were not formed back then.
The reason they probably didn't see any caucasians in North or South America, is probably due to this:
Heavy intermarriage. As nations in the literal sense of the word did not exist back then, people did probably have less problems with intermingling, and of course, exchanging cultures.
They probably said, look, there is another human. That's it.
Besides, I'm not sure about the numbers of people who have supposedly emigrated to the Americas from Europe.
The 'First Nations' have some explaining to do. Because they weren't the 'First Nations': according to the most current research the Americas were first colonized by Europeans. I.o.w. by Caucasians. Solutreans, to be precise. During the last glacial max, via the ice sheet covering the north Atlantic. At least 10,000 years before the proto-Indians, the ancestors of the 'First Nations', streamed across the Bering Land Bridge in (relatively) great numbers.
The clincher is 'geological fingerprinting': “What’s more, chemical analysis carried out last year on a European-style stone knife found in Virginia back in 1971 revealed that it was made of French-originating flint.”
But when the Phoenician traders, Irish monks, Viking settlers, and Columbian conquistadores came looking, millennia later, there wasn't a Caucasian left. Only the 'First Nations'.
So what happened to the Caucasian earliest colonizers of America?
Those who first proposed this scenario of the Caucasian via-the-ice-sheet-colonizers, almost a decade ago, were ridiculed of course.
They have now clearly been vindicated.
[/quote]
I don't think that there are explanations to be done:
-The colonizers were clearly of perhaps distinct human cultures who lived a hunter gatherer style. Even the major language families were not formed back then.
The reason they probably didn't see any caucasians in North or South America, is probably due to this:
Heavy intermarriage. As nations in the literal sense of the word did not exist back then, people did probably have less problems with intermingling, and of course, exchanging cultures.
They probably said, look, there is another human. That's it.
Besides, I'm not sure about the numbers of people who have supposedly emigrated to the Americas from Europe.
![[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i128.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp161%2Fazmhyr%2Ftrkdevletbayraklar.jpg)
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?
