The only real question of design in science (cosmology) is why the observable universe began in a low entropy state when a high entropy state is much more likely (by much I mean much100) and there have been answers proposed that are more then adequate explanations by both Aguirre and Gratton and Carroll and Chen.
Both papers show the universe can be natural with no design.
My question would be why is it that some people try to use science to provide evidence for their idiotic fables and personal beliefs when it is clear they know nothing of science past what they might have retained from high school?
Both papers show the universe can be natural with no design.
My question would be why is it that some people try to use science to provide evidence for their idiotic fables and personal beliefs when it is clear they know nothing of science past what they might have retained from high school?
