|
Blunder by NAP?
|
 (March 16, 2012 at 12:55 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: ...since there's nothing to be gained by attacking the WBC. Unless you can manage to kill all of them at once.
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Blunder by NAP? - by thesummerqueen - March 16, 2012 at 9:33 am
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by The Grand Nudger - March 16, 2012 at 9:35 am
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by thesummerqueen - March 16, 2012 at 9:38 am
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by Jaysyn - March 16, 2012 at 9:43 am
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by Napoléon - March 16, 2012 at 11:05 am
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by thesummerqueen - March 16, 2012 at 11:10 am
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by Napoléon - March 16, 2012 at 12:04 pm
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by thesummerqueen - March 16, 2012 at 12:07 pm
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by Doubting Thomas - March 16, 2012 at 12:55 pm
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by Jaysyn - March 16, 2012 at 3:58 pm
RE: Blunder by NAP? - by The Grand Nudger - March 16, 2012 at 4:01 pm
|
