(March 19, 2012 at 9:46 pm)mediamogul Wrote: I think the important distinction to make is between a lie and a conviction. A lie is where someone knows the facts but intentionally misrepresents them. A conviction is where someone actually believes something. I believe the vast majority of people have propogated religion out of conviction rather than outright lying. This is a sadder point to make. The con-man knows he is a con-man and don't get me wrong religion has had some exceptional con men but overwhelmingly people have spread it because they actually believe it which is just disheartening to think of.
Absolutely, it's not a lie if you believe it to be true. Part of what I was attempting to imply is that a very great many people have become unwitting accomplices to the longest con.
I'll be the first to admit that this is all speculative. It just seems to me that a) it's not true or at least can't be known to be, b) figuring out that it's not true isn't terribly difficult if one chooses to be honest about what one knows, and c) there has to be many "in" the con who are aware of a).
On the other hand, there's the possibility that the con has been going so long that all of those "in the know" are long dead and it's taken on a life of it's own. I don't think I'm pessimistic enough about the human race to believe that, however.
