RE: Cannabis
August 13, 2009 at 3:06 pm
(This post was last modified: August 13, 2009 at 3:24 pm by Meatball.)
^ Someone actually used that as an argument in court, saying he was exempt from US law because he was his own country.
What I meant in my previous post is this: Your argument is a valid one for the illegality of driving stoned, but not for the possession of marijuana.
I agree that marijuana should be classified somewhere similar to alcohol. Keep it away from kids, regulate it's availability. Lettuce could be used with tobacco, but that shouldn't influence the legality of lettuce.
(August 12, 2009 at 4:49 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: Of course it's valid ... cannabis should be classified as AT LEAST as dangerous as alcohol and, given that it is usually (in my experience ... something I stress because I have no personal objection to it) used with tobacco (a carcinogen) carries greater risk.Your concern is definitely a valid one, I agree with you there.
My concern is that there is no easy way, such as a breathalyser, to9 tell if someone is under the influence.
Kyu
What I meant in my previous post is this: Your argument is a valid one for the illegality of driving stoned, but not for the possession of marijuana.
I agree that marijuana should be classified somewhere similar to alcohol. Keep it away from kids, regulate it's availability. Lettuce could be used with tobacco, but that shouldn't influence the legality of lettuce.
- Meatball
