Evolution

[Drich]

[quote='mediamogul' pid='260943' dateline='1332696255']

So god radiates light? Is he powered by nuclear fusion?

Is all non indecassent light we can make, the result of Nuclear fusion??
(The answer is no)

Seriously you guys if you just take a minute and think about it you can save alittle face. We can make light that does not have anything to do with any type of fusion nor using incandescent light.. Why don't you google artificial light. before your next post.

My question still stands. If we can make this light why wouldn't God be able to do something better? The question is one designed to show not all light comes from stars. If you can admit this your arguments are over, unless you really really want to be schooled by the "back wards Christian."

For artificial lighting to exist, there must exist things to create it. These things ( e.g humans) need stars to exist ( for light, heat, providing heavier elements) so therefore, we need stars to create artificial lighting. Before stars, light could only really be created due to atoms emitting photons as a result of de-excitation, which is fairly random, and mostly won't be visible light.

If God created stars without the assistance of stars to provide all that you say "we" need to create light, then why would you suppose He would need stars to create light that does not find its power source in the fusion reaction we believe that power the stars themselves?

God separated the light from the darkness. no where does it mention all light comes from the sun. We know this to be true because we have created light. If we can create light without making a sun then know with certainty that God can as well.

---

Drich you should watch this.

---

---

You might learn some real science

If you are not able to put what you have seen into your own words then how am i able to challenge/ask question about what i have seen? If I can not do this then what is the point of me watching some video?

I am here to talk to you, not to watch videos and just to hear you say: Yeah, uh huh, That's right, what he said...

---

The monkey man hypothesis is one based on the theory of evolution. Anything and everything that can be accredited to that "theory" will also support the monkey man theory.

No, it will not. Everything accredited to evolution will prove evolution. The fact that you have added on this extra idea does not mean that evidence toward evolution supports your theory since the last time I looked, no evolutionary biologist claims there to have been a garden of Eden with created people in it. So stop saying that evidence for evolution supports your theory, as it does not.

Now please, present evidence that proves the addition you have made to the evolutionary theory, or just admit that it's all wishful, whimsical thinking based on nothing more than a silly fairy tale.

Can you reread the second portion of my post and provide what i requested from you.

Again if you do not know what you are looking for then how can i help you find it?