RE: DARWIN'S MACROEVOLUTION: Why Unscientific?
April 16, 2012 at 3:34 pm
(This post was last modified: April 16, 2012 at 3:37 pm by Reforged.)
(April 13, 2012 at 8:28 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:
1.[/b] Just like Charles Darwin, the modern-day evolution scientific community asserts that every single animal that has ever existed came from one common ancestor aka came from a single animal (macro-evolution). Is there evidence proving that humans or animals evolved from completely different beings than what they presently are?
2. Fossils are the bones of long-dead animals. Do fossils exist that show evolutionary transition of one type of animal to an entirely different type of animal (eg. a whale evolving into a bear)--which is an example of macro-evolution?
3. When people in the pro-evolution scientific community speak about animals evolving into "new species," are they referring to one family of animal evolving into an entirely different family of animal (eg. a squirrel evolving into a bat or a dinosaur evolving into a bird)--which are examples of macro-evolution? Or are they referring to variations of the exact same type of animal (eg. Doberman dog, Bull dog, Rottweiler dog)--which is an example of micro-evolution?[/color]
1. Yes, you should go look for it on wikipedia. Try typing in "homo-erectus" and "homo-habilis".
2. Not how it works, you've completely misunderstood. Stupid question. See wikipedia.
3. No modern-day scientists are making *any* such claims that bats evolved from squirrels. Thats not macro-evolution, thats pokemon. Please do everyone a favor and type "evolution" on wikipedia instead of wasting our time with questions you can easily answer yourself but are probably avoiding the answers to.
