RE: Are Atheists addicted to conflict?
April 17, 2012 at 10:07 am
(This post was last modified: April 17, 2012 at 10:09 am by Mister Agenda.)
(April 13, 2012 at 2:36 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: Whether you meant offense or not thats the kind of obnoxious response I'm talking about.
If that's the kind of obnoxious response you're talking about, I'd say we're being pretty civil.
(April 13, 2012 at 2:36 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: It is not an approach that is going to convince people to take your point into consideration.
There's more than one way to skin a cat. Perhaps different approaches work in different situations or on different people. Why do you object to any approach different from yours (the soft sell)?
(April 13, 2012 at 2:36 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: Also it is a movement of sorts, its a movement towards the ideal that religion should not interfere with our day to day life
As has been pointed out, that's secularism.
(April 13, 2012 at 2:36 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: and that God isn't needed to give us meaning in our lives.
And that's humanism.
(April 13, 2012 at 2:36 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: I'm sure theres more I could mention but you get the point.
If your point is that secularism and humanism are movements, I get it, and agree. About time, too.
