Sup, im a christian

[Darwinian]

JP isn't arguing in favour of God or gods he is simply putting forward a philosophical argument. As Adrian has already stated, you could just as easily substitute the word God for FSM or IPU or even Santa Clause in any of JP's posts and they would still contain the same argument.

Don't be fooled by complex terms and philosophical phrases as this is just so much linguistic contortion that JP (and others) use in an attempt to counter common sense objections with so much hyperbolism and guff.

And if JP's arguments are so well founded and watertight what exactly has he achieved? The possibility that a non-temporal entity of pure being exists outside the known laws of space and time?

So what? And how does this relate to any of the worlds religions? It certainly doesn't give their peculiar and nonsensical claims any credence does it?

JP is simply behaving like a politician by using his own style of language, repeating himself over and over again, not allowing himself to be pinned down to specifics and in the end, saying nothing.

And anyway, as everything that JP has said on this subject is purely based on some form of non-temporal realm that lies outside the Cosmos and can never be subject to any form of investigation it lies firmly in the realm of philosophy. I could argue just as eliquently in favour of string theory, multiple branes and time never having a beginning but where would it get us? Nowhere!