And to summise precisely THAT Evie you have to cling to marginalist philosophy. Exactly my point.
@ Darwinian: He has provided a complete and logical argument that you haven't refuted.
@ Retorth: I understand his position and can affirm it is 100% in line with mine. Quite shocking as I've never seen evidence of a Catholic I consider to be a Christian. Up until now I was clinging on to an idea I held in principle to be possible. (Christians define 'Christian' as those that follow the Nicene creed)
As non Christians you can't accept what he says but you can logically follow it the same as I can. This is what I'm talking about.
I understand fully the challenges made and see that none come near to disproving the logic. I absolutely consider doubts all the time. I couldn't hold faith if I didn't. It's integral. Jon Paul has absolutely answered all comers. How you can say he hasn't astounds me. A huge denial of the facts in front of you.
@ Kyu: We just need to see the thread to witness your ass kicked dude
@ Darwinian: He has provided a complete and logical argument that you haven't refuted.
@ Retorth: I understand his position and can affirm it is 100% in line with mine. Quite shocking as I've never seen evidence of a Catholic I consider to be a Christian. Up until now I was clinging on to an idea I held in principle to be possible. (Christians define 'Christian' as those that follow the Nicene creed)
As non Christians you can't accept what he says but you can logically follow it the same as I can. This is what I'm talking about.
I understand fully the challenges made and see that none come near to disproving the logic. I absolutely consider doubts all the time. I couldn't hold faith if I didn't. It's integral. Jon Paul has absolutely answered all comers. How you can say he hasn't astounds me. A huge denial of the facts in front of you.
@ Kyu: We just need to see the thread to witness your ass kicked dude
