RE: Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?
April 29, 2012 at 1:35 am
(This post was last modified: April 29, 2012 at 1:38 am by Cyberman.)
Right - so all the accumulated evidence, such as the CMB which exactly matches Big Bang predictions, galaxies Doppler-shifted precisely as predicted by Big bang expansion, plus all the masses of mathematical calculations based on that evidence... that's all myth. Right. Got it. As opposed to - what? A timeless, spaceless über-scientist who magically wished the Universe into being and has a personal interest in the bedroom habits of one group of jumped-up apes living on one infinitesimal speck of rock lost in the immense wastes of that Universe, yet made it all appear as though it didn't have or need a Creator?
One of these things is not like the other.
One of these things is not like the other.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
