Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 9, 2024, 10:22 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DARWIN'S MACROEVOLUTION: Why Unscientific?
#43
RE: DARWIN'S MACROEVOLUTION: Why Unscientific?
@ the OP

Chapter four of Darwin’s book On The Origin Of Species is titled difficulties on theory. In it he discussed the features of flying squirrels and lemurs as a possible transitional form between small tree dwelling mammals and bats. He never suggests that at some point in history a squirrel gave birth to a bat. Rather he explains the changes necessary to change the form of the tree dwelling gliding mammals, themselves transitional forms, into the form of a bat.

If Darwin’s theory is correct we would expect to find within the fossil record a series of forms distributed through time that show a transition from the early mammalian form to that of bats. Indeed that is exactly what we find. Within the fossil record we have Multituberculates that are more than 150 million yo. These are followed by Volaticotherium antiquus, a squirrel sized glider at least 125 million yo. Finally we find the appearance of the earliest true bats more than 50 million years ago. These early bats were themselves a transitional form. They possessed the general body form of bats, but had yet to evolve the features necessary for echolocation.

Please defend your claims of no transitional forms in light of the fact that I have specifically addressed one of your claims of things that do not exist in the fossil record.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
[Image: JUkLw58.gif]
Reply



Messages In This Thread
DARWIN'S MACROEVOLUTION: Why Unscientific? - by Alter2Ego - April 13, 2012 at 8:28 pm
RE: DARWIN'S MACROEVOLUTION: Why Unscientific? - by Thor - April 16, 2012 at 10:13 am
RE: DARWIN'S MACROEVOLUTION: Why Unscientific? - by Phil - April 13, 2012 at 9:51 pm
RE: DARWIN'S MACROEVOLUTION: Why Unscientific? - by Phil - April 14, 2012 at 5:59 am
RE: DARWIN'S MACROEVOLUTION: Why Unscientific? - by Jaysyn - April 16, 2012 at 12:12 pm
RE: DARWIN'S MACROEVOLUTION: Why Unscientific? - by Thor - April 17, 2012 at 9:59 am
RE: DARWIN'S MACROEVOLUTION: Why Unscientific? - by popeyespappy - April 29, 2012 at 12:54 pm
RE: DARWIN'S MACROEVOLUTION: Why Unscientific? - by Thor - April 30, 2012 at 1:17 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Darwin's Voyage on the Beagle, droll dramatization Alex K 2 857 September 17, 2016 at 9:45 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false Rob216 206 37690 November 10, 2014 at 2:02 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Darwin Proven Wrong? sswhateverlove 165 22895 September 15, 2014 at 2:57 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  9 Unscientific Excuses to Ignore Evolution. Duke Guilmon 18 8284 June 5, 2014 at 5:05 pm
Last Post: Ryantology
  Did Darwin get it wrong? Zone 20 4692 September 19, 2013 at 9:58 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth Alter2Ego 190 74858 August 23, 2013 at 6:14 am
Last Post: pocaracas
  Darwin Day KichigaiNeko 2 1506 February 8, 2013 at 8:25 am
Last Post: KichigaiNeko
  Lost Darwin Fossils Rediscovered frankiej 5 3348 January 17, 2012 at 10:55 am
Last Post: frankiej
  Darwin and the tree of life. 5thHorseman 13 5443 November 11, 2011 at 4:33 pm
Last Post: Blam!
  Charles Darwin Program. 5thHorseman 18 6302 September 16, 2011 at 3:15 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)