Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?

[Alter2Ego]

Well, since you are a spamtroll, spewing out the same tired, swiss cheese arguments on multiple sites, a healthy dose of cyberbullying might do you good.

ALTER2EGO -to- EPIMETHEAN:
It might be the same subject matters that I raise at various forums. I don't feel I should have to confine myself to the same group of people by staying on a single forum. Truth be told, I don't even participate at many of the forums I'm registered at. If that were the case, I would be forced to eat and sleep in front of the computer.

In any event, the important thing is that the forums where I do participate, I respond to people respectfully and I specifically address the points of their rebuttals with intelligent answers. I don't go around cursing people out or mocking them or preaching to them. I engage them in intelligent dialogue. Meanwhile, you're contributing nothing to this conversation. So who is the actual troll here?

ALTER2EGO -to- STIMBO:
Since you concede there is nothing random and accidental about laws of physics, tell me, where did such laws come from? They happened by themselves--meaning no intelligent person guided the outcome? Before you answer that question, below is a reminder of how Laws found in nature is defined by Webster's New World Dictionary.

"a sequence of events that have been observed to occur with UNVARYING UNIFORMITY under the same conditions."

There we have it: Because something is found to be consistent, Goddidit.

Boring, banal, and bullshit.

"... by what logic am I supposed to believe that the far more complex universe resulted at random ...?"

The logic that supports science rather than its retarded cousin who excuses religion.

ALTER2EGO -to- EPIMETHEAN:
See what I'm saying? You presented no intelligent rebuttal, no evidence from any credible source to refute what I wrote to Stimbo. I rest my case.

TROLL!