Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
RE: Precision in NatuEvidence of God or Accidents?
April 30, 2012 at 4:02 pm
(April 30, 2012 at 1:59 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:
(April 30, 2012 at 12:15 am)Alter2Ego Wrote:
(April 29, 2012 at 10:34 pm)Stimbo Wrote: As for the assertion that I got my information from some scientific website, I ought to put that to Mr Franks, my senior school Astronomy teacher. Even at the age of 86, I'm sure he'd feel inclined to slap you daft(er) for such an insult. I may verify my information using current scientific knowledge, sure; I happen to care whether what I learn is accurate.
I'll close by reiterating what I said elsewhere: there's nothing random and accidental about the god-damn laws of physics!
ALTER2EGO -to- STIMBO:
Since you concede there is nothing random and accidental about laws of physics, tell me, where did such laws come from? They happened by themselves--meaning no intelligent person guided the outcome? Before you answer that question, below is a reminder of how Laws found in nature is defined by Webster's New World Dictionary.
"a sequence of events that have been observed to occur with UNVARYING UNIFORMITY under the same conditions."
You are doing nothing more than anthropomorphising natural phenomena.
You assume that because something is the way it is then "someone made it that way".
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal