RE: Atheists are Intolerant
May 6, 2012 at 10:30 am
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2012 at 10:39 am by Abishalom.)
(May 6, 2012 at 9:59 am)Napoleon Wrote: You miss the point of the post.I'm sure the church killed millions of people. But like I said previously how many atheists were "martyred" by them. I think you are confusing the deeds of the Catholic church with the religion as whole. Nowhere in the bible does it teach us to do what the Catholic church did. Did you even know that the Catholic church BANNED the bible at one point in time? It's not wonder. They believed they could get away with it if nobody knew the truth. In fact they killed people attempting to translated it into English.
The point is that millions (yes millions) of people have died due to christianity, because people refused to believe. They don't necessarily have to be atheist. They could be Jew, Muslim, agnostic whatever. Doesn't matter what label you give them. That's not the point.
The point is that christianity has oppressed others from doing what they want for hundreds of years. And you complain now that secularists simply want religion and normal every day life seperated?
Quote:BUT FUCK IT. You want to go there? Let's fucking go there.Yes I am aware that these events did in fact occur. But what did ANY of these events have to do with alleged atheistic persecution? You are trying to take known truth an stretch them to your "atheism vs Christianity" delusion. Did you really try to list the holocaust as justification for atheistic martyrdom (you can't be serious)? How many atheists do you suppose were "martyred" in these events (a percentage would be nice) in correlation to Christians believers?
Here's a list of just a few examples of what happens in the name of christianity:
(May 6, 2012 at 10:28 am)Tempus Wrote:Oh no I wasn't saying that. I was essentially suggesting that your argument of expectations of said event occurring due to said group's proportion distribution in society could go both ways. Perhaps I should have worded it better. I was saying that atheist will claim that atheists are less likely to commit a crime. But if you examine their proportion in related to the societies they live in that is what we should expect. Is that more clear?(May 6, 2012 at 10:15 am)Abishalom Wrote: Yeah I see where you're coming from. It's like when the atheist claims that atheists are less like to commit a crime. Well when you compare their proportion to the society they live in, one would expect that number to be lower...wouldn't we?
I currently have no expectations since I haven't seen any statistics or studies about it. If you're suggesting that atheists tend to be over represented when it comes to crime (eg, 5% of society X is made up of atheists, but they're responsible for 20% of the crime) then I'm fine with that being a possibility. If this is what you're asserting however, you'll need to prove it.