There's no nicer way to say this but...

[kılıç_mehmet]

Sure, it isn't. But it's close. It's a genetic defect that, in todays world, keeps these individuals from joining normal society as it progressed throughout history. From my viewpoint, such gene defects should be closely examined, and purged from the human gene pool if possible.
Just like down's syndrome.

WHAT THE FUCK? You can't be serious... How is it a genetic defect? People are attracted to different things.

And it's not about them getting married. It's that they are tired of feeling left out of society because of who they find attractive. Banning gay marriage tells them that their relationships do not belong in the country. It tells them that they are wrong. Legalizing gay marriage would show that these relationships are acceptable.

I fucking am serious. Maybe in the far future, we can do this. I seriously see no real relevance of homosexuality to human society but to create unrest and confusion.
You're talking of it as though it was a matter of choice. And I was repeatedly told here that is was not a "matter of preference", but a fixed thing, something that you're born with, which means that there is a gene that is responsible for it, yes?
Maybe in the future we can detect such children who have high risks of showing homosexuality in the future life and abort them early on, just as we do this to children who might be born deaf, blind or mentally retarted. I certainly would not hesitate a single second to abort the ones I've mentioned in the last post, so why would I hesitate with the homosexuals?
Legalizing gay marriage serves no real purpose but to show that marriage can be bent and loosened as much as you want it to. It's to hamper with the fundamental workings of society.
Gays can be given a seperate existence, like a civil union, say.
But limits must be there.