There's no nicer way to say this but...

[kılıç_mehmet]

I fucking am serious. Maybe in the far future, we can do this. I seriously see no real relevance of homosexuality to human society but to create unrest and confusion.
You're talking of it as though it was a matter of choice. And I was repeatedly told here that is was not a "matter of preference", but a fixed thing, something that you're born with, which means that there is a gene that is responsible for it, yes?
Maybe in the future we can detect such children who have high risks of showing homosexuality in the future life and abort them early on, just as we do this to children who might be born deaf, blind or mentally retarted. I certainly would not hesitate a single second to abort the ones I've mentioned in the last post, so why would I hesitate with the homosexuals?
Legalizing gay marriage serves no real purpose but to show that marriage can be bent and loosened as much as you want it to. It's to hamper with the fundamental workings of society.
Gays can be given a seperate existence, like a civil union, say.
But limits must be there.

I don't even know what to say to this. It's not a fucking disorder. It's sexual preference. Some men like blondes. Others might like girls with blue eyes. And others like men. It's what they are attracted to. There's no genetic defect.

It serves the purpose of showing that we give a fuck about them. That they ARE people. Obviously, to you, they aren't. But it's homophobes like you who keep societies from advancing.

People don't seem to make up their mind what the hell homosexuality is supposed to be.
If it's a preference, it means that you choose whether you like to be homosexual or not. Am I right or wrong?

They are people, but so are...say pedophiles. Theirs too, is a matter of preference, I guess.
Maybe letting them have their ways will aid society.
Maybe allowing incestious relationships to become normal will aid society to become more advanced?
I don't think I have anything else to say about this.