There's no nicer way to say this but...

[Mister Agenda]

Way to go NC!!

No surprise there.

Why should their sin be legitimized?

Why should your religous preferences be law?

The homosexual community in choosing topursue their sexual preference rejected the normal way of life why should they be entitled to receive anyof the benefits that come with that normal life?

Because they're American citizens. In America, everyone is supposed to be equal in the eyes of the law. In Christostan, you might have a point.

You are allowing the homosexual community to have its cake and eat it too. That is never a good situation and demonstrates favortism for sinful and wrongbehavior. Nothing good comes from a union beteen homosexuals, why let it continue?

It's not the government's place to enforce your religious preferences.

How is allowing gay marriage for the better?

All American citizens are supposed to have the same rights. Allowing gays to marry gives them the same rights as heterosexual Americans.

You are just like the California homosexual community. You and they are only happy and support democracy when its results are in your favor but when it goes against you then it is ridiculous, wrong, and influenced by religion.

I don't support pure democracy at all. I support the system we have: a Constitutional Democratic Republic that protects the rights of minorities from the tyranny of the majority. We all find ourselves in a minority sometimes, you might want to think about that.

You forget that people have free choice and they are allowed to freely choose against same sex marriage.

Of course they have a right to freely choose not to engage in same sex marriage. It's whether they have the right to use force of law to prevent other people from exercising their free choice for same sex marriage that is the issue at hand.

Atheists do not have a monopoly on free will or choice.

Neither do heterosexual Christianists, but you wouldn't know if from what happened in NC.

If you have to win each time then you are not advocating democracy but dictatorship in your and thehomosexual's favor.

Pure democracy is mob rule, and why we have a constitutionally-limited democracy. Otherwise we could have 60% wolves and 40% sheep voting on what's for dinner.

That is not right for their are more people living in a democracy than just atheists and gays.

Voting against gays having the right to marry is just as wrong as voting against parent's right to homeschool. Being in the majority doesn't give you the authority to (literally) force your views on those who disagree.