There's no nicer way to say this but...

[kılıç_mehmet]

I enjoy spending my time with women,

So do many homosexuals, I guess.

That doesn't define the essence of my being

It doesn't? It does, actually. You're doing the bidding of the body with which you were born. It requires you to like women. You are not a deviant from the default type, the "normal" type.

you shouldn't assume anyones sexuality defines the essence of theirs.

I do not assume things. The homosexuals want to be known as "homosexuals" and have built their communities on that identity. I never built my identity upon my sexual orientation, or even my gender association.

They define themselves by their sexuality, not I.
Same goes for any other sexual minority.
Weird people, the lot.

Anyone whos willing to judge an entire section of society based on who they fall in love with doesn't even measure up to "childlike", most children could tell you thats not how you judge the value of a person.

It's not about love. It never was about law. As you said it in your previous post, they want their sexuality(practices included) to be recognized by the society, not their love or whatsoever.
I judge people according to which criteria they want to be judged.
They want to be judged according to their sexuality.
I oblige them.
But how I judge the "value" of a person is quite a lot more complex than that.
But I could tell you this that a homosexual would incur no penalties on my part if I would see respect for social conduct on his part.

Most children could tell you its an individuals actions and deeds thats make them the person they are, not their sexuality.

That is because children are generally happily ignorant about the current state of affairs.
The homosexuals, mind, I speak of them as homosexuals, I don't refer to them by their religion, race, or tribal association, which should actually give you a hint on how the slightest deviation from the sexual norm can actually shift the identity of a person. They also accept this, and refer to themselves as such.

This is demonstrated by abusive hetrosexual parents, according to you they're wired correctly but have still failed to take proper care of their child

Ah yes, they're wired correctly. And they have brought forth a child, because of it. Failing to take "proper care" of the child is not really sign of whether you are wired correctly or incorrectly, it is a sign of how mature you are. If you enter an unplanned pregnancy, with economic hardships and fears of having to take care of an unwanted child while you're so young, or just not ready, are all psychological factors affecting these.
In a planned pregnancy within a marriage, things generally go pretty well.
Me, for example.

In my humble opinion, a morale homosexual father who teaches and nurtures his son when compared to a immorale hetrosexual father beating and berating his is more worthy of the privledge that is parenthood regardless of eithers sexuality.

Well, still, no. A child that grows up in an environment that involves two homosexuals will grow up with confusion. Even the worst of normal families lack this type of confusion.
Besides, I could say the same by stating that the moral heterosexual father will always be vastly superior to the homosexual "father" or "mother" whatever role they like to play within the marriage, the child will be obviously unable to comprehend these, how much the homosexuals try to explain, the more they will grow confused themselves at what the hell they're doing.

I know you will disagree with this, it is deeply ingrained in you and will have been from birth that someone who is not of the mainstream sexuality is in someway sub-human and destructive to the fabric of your society.

I will, but not because I consider gays subhuman. My criteria for that one is not related to sexual orientation.
But I won't deny that it's harmful to the fabric of any society, not just mine.