Above you said: "I pointed out the illogicality of Meatballs post, which was proved to stand by Pippy's thanks (meaning he confirmed that this is not what he meant, and EV concurred)." - which is not an explanation, it's an assertion. I responded to this, I think more than once now...and you just say you've explained it...no, as always you asserted it.
I'm not talking about the insult, I'm saying that that the implications in Pippy's post that Meatball speaks of, appear indeed to be there. You have explained how they're not, you've just asserted stuff (as you so often do).
EvF
I'm not talking about the insult, I'm saying that that the implications in Pippy's post that Meatball speaks of, appear indeed to be there. You have explained how they're not, you've just asserted stuff (as you so often do).
EvF
