RE: DARWIN'S MACROEVOLUTION: Why Unscientific?
May 21, 2012 at 7:22 pm
(This post was last modified: May 21, 2012 at 7:23 pm by Epimethean.)
"I read up on Ambulocetus and Acanthostega and was not impressed. The language used in describing Ambulocetus is so speculative that it amounts to science fiction writing."
You should be plenty comfortable with speculative language, given your favorite book of fantasy-which, mind you, lacks the entirety of the science portion of fiction.
You should be plenty comfortable with speculative language, given your favorite book of fantasy-which, mind you, lacks the entirety of the science portion of fiction.
Trying to update my sig ...