So he was an atheist then a theist and all this took place within 16 years of his life? I doubt if he actually understands anything to do with atheism and science.
Let me guess. This evidence is the kind of evidence that is only supported by superstition and not science. I reckon theists take the word "evidence" and change it's meaning to support their claims. Then when we say it's not evidence they complain and say we desire some kind of special evidence. In a sense attacking the actual meaning for evidence.
I require evidence! Scientific evidence and nothing less. Study-able, research-able record-able.
Just thought I'd clear that up before you start claiming to have evidence.
Let me guess. This evidence is the kind of evidence that is only supported by superstition and not science. I reckon theists take the word "evidence" and change it's meaning to support their claims. Then when we say it's not evidence they complain and say we desire some kind of special evidence. In a sense attacking the actual meaning for evidence.
I require evidence! Scientific evidence and nothing less. Study-able, research-able record-able.
Just thought I'd clear that up before you start claiming to have evidence.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
