RE: Origin of Articles
June 4, 2012 at 9:03 am
(This post was last modified: June 4, 2012 at 9:21 am by elunico13.)
(June 2, 2012 at 12:14 pm)Tobie Wrote: Evolution isn't a belief system. Also, how do any of the answers given show that evolution is illogical? Actually back up your statements.
The laws of logic appear unchanging to us because we all are the same species, therefore we will think in the same, or a similar way.
Because we are the same species we now all have the same brain? Don't think so... If laws of logic depended on each other's brain then we could each have our own laws of logic. They wouldn't be laws would they? They wouldn't be universal. They exist outside of our brains. AND we use laws of logic to CORRECT our ways of thinking.
Could the universe have existed and not existed at the same time and in the same way before humans came along???
(June 2, 2012 at 2:15 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: Elunico13 does not seem to grasp the idea at all.
He is a 'if there are laws who is the law maker' idiot.
The "laws" are our desrcription of the physical world they in no way suggest that the laws are "made" just that that is how things are.
Well if we all thought like you I could just say God is true and "that's how things are".
You're sidestepping the question.
Laws aren't our description of the world. Many people describe the world in different ways. i.e. evolutionists and creationists. Laws of logic often CORRECT our ways of thinking. Allow logic to do its work for you LOL!
So I logically explained they're not personal or they wouldn't be universal. So how do you account for them in an evolutionistic view?
(June 2, 2012 at 4:52 pm)libalchris Wrote:(June 2, 2012 at 12:08 pm)elunico13 Wrote: How do you account for immaterial, universal and unchanging laws of logic in a strictly material universe?Oh well YOU think so therefore it MUST be right. That convinced me, I'm converting.
The answers given show that evolutionists have an inconsistent and illogical belief system.
In all seriousness, the "laws" of logic, and other things (mathematics, physics, etc.) are simply creations we've made to describe a material universe. The question you're asking is nonsensical. It's like asking "how do you account for the existence of numbers?" numbers are simply a representation we use to better explain the material universe we live in.
Laws of logic not universal anymore? Human creations!?!?
If that's the case then you should be able to logically answer this simple question.
Could the universe have existed and not existed at the same time and in the same way before humans came along???
James Holmes acted consistent with what evolution teaches. He evolved from an animal, and when he murdered those people, He acted like one. You can't say he's wrong since evolution made him that way.
