(June 21, 2012 at 10:30 pm)elunico13 Wrote: Do you realize that when you observe scientific evidence you are interpreting it by your presuppositions? That would be your worldview which everyone has. I see you want repeatable blind tests to prove the healing, but I see this as a double standard since you haven't applied this to your presupposed beliefs.Help me out here. What presuppositions are these again?
Quote:The list goes on. The debate on origins is a philosophical one whether you like it or not. Experts agree on this, but you are welcome to disagree.It's not the philosophy I object to. It's the "babble" part. Apologetics offers philosophy the same way Creationism offers science.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
