I've seen a few cases like this, and every time I've wondered how anyone can call it a brave and selfless thing to do - yeah, let's bring a kid into the world never knowing it's mother, chances are knowing that it was responsible for their mother being dead, and leave the father with a kid he doesn't know at the expense of a woman he did know and love. And all of this is assuming the child survives.
I'm pro-choice so of course I believe it's up to every woman to make that choice for themselves, I just honestly believe that when it comes down to a choice between the woman's life and a bunch of cells, there's not really much of a choice to be made. Save yourself, then when you're better try for another kid.
I'm pro-choice so of course I believe it's up to every woman to make that choice for themselves, I just honestly believe that when it comes down to a choice between the woman's life and a bunch of cells, there's not really much of a choice to be made. Save yourself, then when you're better try for another kid.
"No-one who decides that scientific evidence is not for him and that his own experience or the stories of others is the be all and end all of deciding what's true ever has the right to call people searching for reliable, repeatable evidence narrow-minded. That is hypocrisy of the most laughable kind." Derren Brown - Tricks of the Mind.
